Rajendra Raosaheb Kamble v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The bail application was disposed of as withdrawn since it was informed that the applicant is absconding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4-BA-2398-22.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2398 OF 2022
Rajendra Raosaheb Kamble …Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra …Respondent
Mr. Aniket Vagal a/w Kunal Pednekar a/w Savvy Kolhekar for the Applicants.
Mrs. M. H. Mhatre, APP for the State.
Ms. Tanu Bhatia for the Complainant.
CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATED : 7 DECEMBER 2023
P.C. :-
It is informed that the applicant is absconding. In that view of the
matter, learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the
present application. The Bail Application is disposed of as withdrawn.
(N.R. BORKAR, J.)
MJ Jadhav
1 / 1
Rajendra Raosaheb Kamble
The State of Maharashtra
N.R. BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court