Dismissed

Basavraj Mahadev Teli @ Kannapanavar v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC7 Dec 2023BA/3243/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Section 439 CrPC for murder, the High Court rejected the petition citing the brutal nature of the crime and eyewitness evidence, but directed the trial court to conclude the trial quickly due to three years of pre-arrest detention.

What did the court decide?

Bail application rejected; Trial Court directed to conclude trial as early as possible.

Basavraj Mahadev Teli @ Kannapanavar Vs the… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

1/3

¶2

16-ba-3243-23.doc

¶3

Digitally signed by DINESH DINESH SADANAND SADANAND SHERLA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY SHERLA Date: 2023.12.07 17:38:29 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION +0500 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3243 OF 2023

¶4

Basavraj Mahadev Teli @ Kannapanavar V/s. The State of Maharashtra

¶5

…Applicant

¶6

...Respondent.

¶7

Mr. Satyavrat Joshi a/w. Ms Shivani Kondekar i/b Mr. A.S. Vernekar for the Applicant.

¶8

Ms M.H. Mhatre, APP for the Respondent/State.

¶9

CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 07.12.2023.

¶10

P.C. :

¶11

This is an application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure for bail.

¶12

The applicant came to be arrested in Crime No.559 of 2020 registered at Shivaji Nagar Police Station, Kolhapur for the ofences punishable under Sections 302, 307, 323, 504 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

It is the case of the prosecution that on 7 November 2020, the present applicant along with other co-accused assaulted the deceased by knife and committed his murder.

1/3

Dinesh S. Sherla

2/3

16-ba-3243-23.doc

I have heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent – State.

¶19

The learned counsel for the applicant submits that this Court by order dated 15 November 2022, while disposing of the bail application fled by the applicant, granted liberty to fle fresh application for bail, if the trial is not concluded within nine months. It is submitted that the trial has not yet commenced and the same is at the stage of framing of charge. It is submitted that considering the facts and circumstances and as the applicant is in jail for more than three years, he may be released on bail.

¶20

On the other hand, learned APP submits that the applicant is involved in brutal murder. It is submitted that there are eye-witnesses. It is thus submitted that the application may be rejected.

¶21

I have perused the statement of eye-witnesses. According to the eye-witnesses, on the date of alleged incident, the present applicant came to the place of incident with co-accused and assaulted the deceased by knife. The cause of death is multiple stab injuries.

2/3

Dinesh S. Sherla

3/3

16-ba-3243-23.doc

Considering the nature of ofence, I am not inclined to release the applicant on bail. The Application is thus rejected. However, considering the fact that the applicant is in jail for more than three years, the trial Court shall endeavour to conclude the trial as early as possible.

¶27

With aforesaid directions, the application is disposed of.

¶28

[N.R.BORKAR, J.]

¶29

3/3

¶30

Dinesh S. Sherla

Basavraj Mahadev Teli @ Kannapanavar v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Basavraj Mahadev Teli @ Kannapanavar v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vakeel Ahmed Shaikh Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Raju @ Sartaj Hamid Shaikh vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Madhukar Rupraoji Adhau and Others vs Chandrashekhar Kisanrao Bhagwat and Others

Basavraj Mahadev Teli @ Kannapanavar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Anil Tukaram Somvanshi and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Shabbir Mohammad Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra