Allowed

Mangldas Vitthal Bandal v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC18 Jan 2023BA/158/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge Bench allowed bail to the applicant charged with offences under Indian Penal Code for cheating and forgery against a bank. Bail granted on furnishing bond and undertaking not to object to auction of mortgaged properties.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed on furnishing PR Bond of Rs. 25,000 with sureties and undertaking not to object to auction of mortgaged properties.

Mangldas Vitthal Bandal Vs State of Maharashtra — Cheque Dishonour | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

3-ba-158-22.doc

¶2

Digitally signed by DINESH DINESH SADANAND SADANANDSHERLA SHERLADate: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY 2023.02.14 18:09:13 +0500 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 158 OF 2022

¶3

Mangaldas V. Bandal V/s.

State of Maharashtra

…Applicant

...Respondent.

Mr. Aabad Ponda, Sr. Advocate i/b Mr. Shailesh Kharat for the Applicant.

¶8

Mr.V.B. Konde-Deshmukh, APP for the Respondent/State.

¶9

CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 18.01.2023.

¶10

P.C. :

¶11

This is an application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure for bail.

¶12

The applicant came to be arrested in Crime No.367 of 2021 registered at Shikrapur Police Station, Pune Rural for the ofences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120B read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

I have heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent – State.

¶14

The allegation against the present applicant and other coaccused are of defrauding Shivajirao Bhosale Sahakari Bank. According to the prosecution, the present applicant and his wife had availed the loan of Rs.2.50 crores by submitting forged documents. According to the prosecution, as on the date of fling

1/2

Dinesh S. Sherla

3-ba-158-22.doc

of frst information report the outstanding loan amount was Rs.2,57,69,259/-. The learned Senior Counsel for the applicant submits that there are properties mortgaged against the said loan and bank can very well auction the said properties. The learned APP has not disputed the said fact.

¶19

The applicant is in jail for more than 1 and ½ years. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail. In the result, the following order is passed.

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

A] Bail Application is allowed.

¶22

B] The applicant be released on bail in C.R. No. 367 of 2021 registered at Shikrapur Police Station, Pune Rural for the ofences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120B read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code on furnishing P.R Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with one or two sureties in the like amount.

¶23

C] The applicant shall not raise any objections to the auction sale of the mortgaged properties. In case, the applicant does so, the prosecution is at liberty to move application for cancellation of bail.

¶24

[N.R.BORKAR, J.]

¶25

2/2

¶26

Dinesh S. Sherla

Mangldas Vitthal Bandal v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mangldas Vitthal Bandal v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mangesh Eknath Thakur Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sachin Sitaram Pawar Vs State of Maharashtra

Ramesh Pandharinath Pawar Vs State of Maharashtra

Vikas Gorakh Jadhav Vs State of Maharashtra

Ritu Mayur Gaikwad Vs State of Maharashtra

Rohit Kishor Ghoran Vs the State of Maharashtra