In this anticipatory bail application, the High Court of Bombay denied bail, noting that the applicant fled the application site four years after the alleged murder, and a co-accused statement placed him at the scene of the crime.
The anticipatory bail application is rejected and the applicant is not released.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
907-aba-15-23.doc
Digitally signed by DINESH DINESH SADANAND SADANAND SHERLA SHERLA Date: 2023.02.22 18:16:57 +0500
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.15 OF 2023
Vikas G. Jadhav …Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent.
...Respondent.
Mr. Ritesh Thobde for the Applicant. Mr. A.A. Palkar, APP for the Respondent/State
CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 18.01.2023.
P.C. :
1/2
Dinesh S. Sherla
907-aba-15-23.doc
[N.R.BORKAR, J.]
2/2
Dinesh S. Sherla
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to anticipatory bail in a murder case where he fled the application site four years after the alleged crime.
Whether custodial interrogation is necessary given the lack of overt acts attributed to the applicant by the eyewitness.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vikas G. Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
