Allowed

Abhay Nilkanth Satralkar v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Bombay HC12 Sept 2023BA/1316/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad allowed a bail application for an accused in a POCSO case alleging outraging of modesty. The court granted bail on ₹50,000 bail and a surety, imposing conditions to prevent witness tampering and restricting entry to a specific area.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; applicant released on bail with one solvent surety of ₹50,000 on specified conditions.

Abhay Nilkanth Satralkar Vs the State of… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

903-BA-1316-23.odt

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

BAIL APPLICATION NO.1316 OF 2023

¶5

ABHAY NILKANTH SATRALKAR VERSUS

¶6

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

¶7

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Shriraj R. Wakale APP for Respondent No.1 : Mr. A. B. Chate Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Devanand Y. Nandedkar (appointed Through Legal Aid)

¶8

CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J.

¶9

DATE : 12-09-2023

¶10

PER COURT :-

¶11

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant, the learned A.P.P. for the respondent/State and the learned counsel for respondent No.2.

¶12

The applicant seeks bail in Crime No.0624 of 2023 registered with Tofkhana Police Station, Ahmednagar, for the offences punishable under Sections 354, 354A, 354B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 8 and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offencs (POCSO) Act, 2012.

¶13

The applicant is sixty-one years old. It has been alleged that he has outraged the modesty of a girl. He is languishing in jail since 22.04.2023. No weapon has been allegedly used in the crime. The investigation has been completed. Nothing is to be

¶14

903-BA-1316-23.odt

¶15

¶16

recovered from the applicant. He has roots at Ahmednagar. He is a rickshaw driver. No purpose would be served by keeping him behind bar. However, the interest of the victim and the witnesses has to be guarded by certain conditions. Hence, the order:-

¶17

i) The application is allowed.

¶18

ii) Applicant Abhay Nilkanth Satralkar be released on bail, on furnishing PB and SB of Rs.50,000/-, with one solvent surety of the like amount, in the above crime for the aforesaid offences, on the conditions that,

¶19

(a) He shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses.

¶20

(b) He shall not contact the victim or her relatives in any mode or manner till conclusion of the trial.

¶21

¶22

(d) He shall not enter Narhari Nagar, Gulmohar Road, Ahmednagar, for two months from the date of his release.

¶23

iii) The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Aurangabad, do pay the fee to the learned counsel appointed for respondent No.2/victim as per the schedule.

¶24

( S. G. MEHARE ) JUDGE

¶25

rrd

Abhay Nilkanth Satralkar v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abhay Nilkanth Satralkar v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vatsalabai Ambadasrao Azade Vs Kamlabai Sakharam Azade and Others

Vatsalabai Ambadasrao Azade Vs Kamlabai Sakharam Azade and Others

Yogesh Sudhakar Chavanke and Another Vs Sitaram Damu Mate

Manjabai Eknath Shewale L.Rs. Ganesh and Ors. Vs Sagunabai Panditrao Anchalwadkar Thr Lrs Asha Manohar Dansure and Ors.

Akshay Nagnath Gaikwad Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Pawankumar Nandkishor Jaiswal Vs Swapnil Chandrakishor Jaiswal and Others