Allowed

Aslam Latif Makrani and Others v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC24 Jan 2023BA/108/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed a bail application filed by three applicants accused of offenses including attempted murder, affray, and intimidation. The court noted discrepancies between alleged weapons and actual injuries, and issuance of bail with specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Applicants released on bail on bond of Rs. 50,000 each with one surety, subject to conditions including staying away from residence for one month and not tampering with evidence.

Aslam Latif Makrani and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

944-ba-108-2023.odt

¶2

(1)

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

BAIL APPLICATION NO. 108 OF 2023

¶5

1. Aslam Latif Makrani

¶6

2. Latif Murad Makrani

¶7

3. Musaji Faruk Panwala ...Applicants

¶8

VERSUS

¶9

The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent

¶10

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Syed Azizoddin R.
APP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.P. Sonpawale

¶11

CORAM : S.G. MEHARE, J.

¶12

 DATED : JANUARY 24, 2023

¶13

PER COURT:-

¶14

1.Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned APP
for the State.

¶15

2.It has been alleged against the applicant Aslam that he
assaulted the injured with iron rod, but the injury certificate reveals
that the injured has suffered simple injury. It has been alleged against
the applicants Latif and Musaji that they assaulted the injured with
fist and blows. Considering the role attributed to them and the
progress in the investigation and recovery of the alleged rod as well as

¶16

the injury sustained to the injured, the Court is of the view that the
application deserve to be allowed. Hence, the following order :

¶17

944-ba-108-2023.odt

¶18

(2)

¶19

ORDER

¶20

(i)Bail Application is allowed.

¶21

(ii)The applicants, (1) Aslam Latif Makrani, (2) Latif Murad
Makrani and (3) Musaji Faruk Panwala, be released on bail on
executing P.B. and S.B. of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand) each
with one solvent surety in the like amount in connection with Crime
No.589 of 2022, registered with Navapur Police Station, Tq. Navapur,
District Nandurbar for the offence punishable under Section 307, 324,
323, 504, 506, 143, 147, 148 r/w 149 of the Indian Penal Code,
Sections 4, 25 of the Arms Act and Sections 37(1)(c), 135 of
Maharashtra Police Act, on the conditions that;

¶22

(a) The applicants shall stay away from their residence for one month from the date of their release.

¶23

(b)The applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution
evidence.

¶24

 (S.G. MEHARE, J.)

¶25

Mujaheed//

Aslam Latif Makrani and Others v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aslam Latif Makrani and Others v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kannaiah @ Kanha Chandraiah Gonela Vs the State of Maharashtra

Jay Kanhaiyalal Bhandarkar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Arjun Babasaheb Dandait Vs the State of Maharashtra

Hanmant Bapurao Bhadre Vs the State of Maharashtra

Gajanan S/O. Parashram Rathod Vs Surekha Gajanan Rathod

Maroti Ramesh Mustare Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another