High Court allowed amendment to place charge-sheet copy on record for challenge. Quashing application for compromise was left over for instructions to Public Prosecutor.
Amendment allowed to place charge-sheet copy on record within one week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 APL1352-21.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPP) NO. 17/2023
IN
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 1352/2021
(DIGAMBAR OKATE & OTHERS VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANOTHER)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders.
Shri D.S. Patil, counsel for the applicants.
Shri A.S. Fulzele, Additional Public Prosecutor for the NA-1.
Shri A.B. Moon, counsel for the NA-2.
CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR AND MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. D ATE : JANUARY 11, 2023 .
Since charge-sheet has been filed the applicants seek to place on record its copy so as to challenge the same, the amendment is allowed. The same be carried out within a period of one week.
The criminal application is disposed of.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 1352/2021 .
The learned counsel for the applicants places reliance on the decision in Shrikrushna Pandurang Tayde & Another Versus State of Maharashtra [ 2017 (4) Mh.L.J. (Cri.) 99 ] and seek quashing of the charge-sheet in view of the compromise.
To enable the learned Additional Public Prosecutor to obtain instructions, stand over 25.01.2023 alongwith Criminal Application (APL) No. 1497 of 2022.
(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.)
APTE
Signed By: Digitally signed byROHIT DATTATRAYA APTE Signing Date:12.01.2023 12:03
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow amendment of charge-sheet and place its copy on record for challenge by applicants.
Whether to quash the charge-sheet in view of compromise.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Shrikrushna Pandurang Tayde & Another Versus State of MaharashtraRelied on¶14
[ 2017 (4) Mh.L.J. (Cri.) 99 ] · Who else cites this
DIGAMBAR OKATE
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
A. S. CHANDURKAR
MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
