Disposed

Suresh S/O Munaji Wanjari v. State of Maharashtra Thr. Its Secretary, Ministry of General Administration Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Bombay HC10 Jan 2023CAW/86/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition challenging placement on a supernumerary post. The court granted liberty to approach respondent authorities for relief under the Government Resolution dated 14.12.2022.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to withdraw writ petition and file representation for release of retiral benefits.

Suresh S/O Munaji Wanjari Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

1 7.wp.269.23.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶3

C IVIL APPLICATION (W) NO.86/2023

¶4

AND

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 269/2023

¶6

Suresh s/o. Munaji Wanjari Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

¶7

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order or directions and Registrar's orders

¶8

........................................................................................................................................……….. Mr. N. C. Phadnis, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. A. S. Fulzele, Addl.G.P. for Respondent No.1/State.

¶9

CORAM : A.S.CHANDURKAR AND MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI,JJ.. DATED : 10.01.2023

¶10

. The challenge raised in this writ petition is to the communication dated 27.12.2019 issued by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nagpur placing the services of the petitioner on a supernumerary post. Since the petitioner has superannuated on 27.06.2022 and is not receiving retiral benefits the aforesaid order has been challenged.

¶11

Civil Application (W) No.86/2023 has been filed seeking disposal of the writ petition in the light of the common judgment in Writ Petition No.1485/2020 (Bharatee Balaji Rapatwar Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Another) and connected matters decided on 16.12.2022 at the Aurangabad Bench. In the said decision notice of the fact that the General Administration Department on 14.12.2022 had issued a Resolution stipulating the manner in which the service benefits should be given to the employees placed on supernumerary posts came to be laid down was taken. In that backdrop various writ petitions challenging the

¶12

2 7.wp.269.23.odt

¶13

Government Resolution dated 21.12.2019 came to be withdrawn and liberty was granted to the petitioners to approach the Court in case their grievance was not satisfied pursuant to the Government Resolution dated 14.12.2022. By filing the said application, the petitioner seeks a similar relief.

¶14

It is submitted that the petitioner would prefer a representation before the respondent Nos.2 to 4 and seek relief of pensionary benefits in the light of Government Resolution dated 14.12.2022.

¶15

In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn. The petitioner is at liberty to make representation to the respondent Nos.2 to 4 for release of retiral benefits in the light of Government Resolution dated 14.12.2022. If the grievance of the petitioner subsists thereafter he is at liberty to take appropriate steps in accordance with law.

¶16

Civil Application and Writ Petition are disposed of.

¶17

( MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI , J.)

¶18

RGurnule

¶19

Digitally signed byRANJANA MANOJ MANDADE Signing Date:11.01.2023 14:47

Suresh S/O Munaji Wanjari v. State of Maharashtra Thr. Its Secretary, Ministry of General Administration Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh S/O Munaji Wanjari v. State of Maharashtra Thr. Its Secretary, Ministry of General Administration Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jayprakash Sahadeorao Manohar Vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Urban Development and Revenue Department, Mumbai

Gajanan S/O Shebrao Gathe Vs Divisional Controller, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Akola and Another

Miss. Juvena John Bhise Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Department of School Education and Sports, Mumbai

Jaya Nilkanth Nerkar Vs the State of Mah. Thr. Rajapeth Ps Amravati and Another

Shri Ramdulal Anilbaran Mandal Vs the Union of India Mumbai through General Manager and Others

Sanjay Shankar Pranjale Vs the State of Mah. Thr. Rajapeth Ps Amravati and Another