Bench allowed application for leave to enable legal representative to continue criminal appeal filed after principal appellant's death, dismissing duplicate filing.
Application disposed off without any order as duplicate prayer already allowed earlier.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 63-appln 690-2022.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 690 OF 2022
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 53 OF 2012
Motilal Shamrao Gaikwad through his L.Rs.
Latabai Motilal Gaikwad
.. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Mr. Sohail Subhedar, Advocate h/f Mr. N. S. Ghanekar, Advocate for the
Applicant.
Mr. Y. G. Gujarathi, APP for Respondent.
CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT, J.
DATED : 20th APRIL, 2023.
P. C. :-
. This application is filed seeking leave to allow the applicant tocontinue with the appeal i.e. Criminal Appeal No. 53/2012 as the
appellant died during the pendency of the appeal.
2. It is submitted that, already the similar prayer was allowed and amendment is already carried out on 20.01.2023. It is submitted that, the application is inadvertently filed though earlier application for the same prayer was allowed and memo was accordingly amended.
3. In view of the same, the criminal application stands disposed off
without any order.
( KISHORE C. SANT, J. )
P.S.B.
1 of 1
Motilal Shamrao Gaikwad through Latabai Motilal Gaikwad
The State of Maharashtra
Kishore C. Sant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court