An applicant sought leave to withdraw a criminal application due to the pendency of a 'B' summary. The court granted leave and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the application granted; Criminal application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
32apln364-19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
32 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.364 OF 2019
RAMRAJE S/O. SIDLING CHANDANE AND ANR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Madhur A. Golegaonkar
APP for Respondent State: Mr. M. M. Nerlikar
Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. P. D. Bachate
CORAM: SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI &
R. M. JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : 9th January, 2023
ORDER :
Learned Advocate for the applicant states that during the
pendency of the application 'B' summary has been filed. In view of
which, he seeks leave to withdraw the application. Leave granted.
Criminal application is dismissed as withdrawn.
( R. M. JOSHI, J)
( SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI J.)
JPChavan
Page 1 of 1
Ramraje S/o. Sidling Chandane
The State of Maharashtra
Anuja Prabhu
R. M. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court