In two criminal applications, the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad granted leave to withdraw the petitions. Consequently, both criminal applications were dismissed as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw; applications dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
criappln533.20.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 533 OF 2020
Shri Gautam s/o Yeshwantrao Watode & others
Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & another
Respondents
Mr. Y. B. Bolkar, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. A. R. Kale, APP for the State.
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2777 OF 2021
Ramprasad Annasaheb Kale
Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra Respondent
Mr. M. V. Salunke, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. A. R. Kale, APP for the State.
CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI & R. M. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 7th JANUARY, 2023.
PER COURT :
( R. M. JOSHI) ( SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI) Judge Judge dyb
Shri Gautam s/o Yeshwantrao Watode & others
The State of Maharashtra
Ramprasad Annasaheb Kale
Anuja Prabhu Desai
R. M. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
