Rushikesh Ramesh Gaikwad v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for restoration of a writ petition disposed of as the applicant failed to appear on hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
917-CriAppln-363-2023
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
917 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 363 OF 2023
IN WP/980/2022
RUSHIKESH S/O RAMESH GAIKWAD VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Nagesh G. Talekar
APP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4-State : Mr. S. J. Salgare
CORAM :MANGESH S. PATIL AND
M. M. SATHAYE, JJ.
DATED :08 MARCH 2023
PER COURT :-
.This is an application for restoration of a writ petition. Still no
one is prosecuting it. None was present on the last date. Though it is
listed under the caption “for dismissal”, none is present even today.
2. The application is dismissed.
[M. M. SATHAYE, J.]
[MANGESH S. PATIL, J.]
vre
Rushikesh S/o Ramesh Gaikwad
The State of Maharashtra
Mangesh S. Patil
M. M. Sathaye
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court