In a habeas corpus petition, the High Court produced a lady and child alleged to be detained. After verifying their statements, the Court found they were not detained and disposed of the petition, setting them at liberty.
The petition was disposed of and the lady and child were set at liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.48 OF 2023
DHANANJAY LAHU WANKHEDE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for the petitioner: Mr. V.B. Patil APP for the respondent – State : Mr.S.D. Ghayal Mr.Ravindra Gangadhar Salve, Police Head Constable-676 Police Station Chikhalthana, Aurangabad (Rural) present
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATE : 06 MARCH 2023
PC :
The lady and the child named in the petition for habeaus corpus are produced before us by the Police Station Chikhalthana.
4. Petition is disposed of. They are set at liberty.
[ M.M. SATHAYE ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL ] JUDGE JUDGE
sga/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner in his habeas corpus petition is entitled to the production of the lady and child and their release.
DHANANJAY LAHU WANKHEDE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
MANGESH S. PATIL
M.M. SATHAYE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
