Application dismissed. Court found no case made out against applicant based on FIR and police statements, ruling that no notice need be issued.
No notice to be issued; application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 907-appln 2794-23.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2794 OF 2023
Rajratan Uddhav Dipke
.. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another
.. Respondents
Mr. M. R. Wagh, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. A. R. Kale, APP for Respondent No. 1.
CORAM : R. G. AVACHAT AND
KISHORE C. SANT, JJ.
DATED : 01st NOVEMBER, 2023.
PER COURT :-
. Heard learned advocate for the applicant.2.We have perused the FIR and related papers. The FIR was
recorded in the hospital. The name of the applicant in FIR is shown as
Rajendra, but in R.C.C. No. 283/2021 it is shown as Rajratan.
Difference in the name of the applicant attributes some overwriting.
The statement of son of the informant reinforce the same. It is only
change in the name of applicant – Rajratan who named as Rajendra in
FIR.
3. Since the role of the applicant has been specified in the FIR and
in the police statements, we find that no case is made out and even
1 of 2
2 907-appln 2794-23.odt notice need not be issued.
4. The application stands dismissed.
( KISHORE C. SANT )( R. G. AVACHAT )
JUDGE JUDGE
P.S.B.
2 of 2
Rajratan Uddhav Dipke
The State of Maharashtra
R. G. Avachat
Kishore C. Sant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court