Partly allowed
Imran Sikandar Nadaf and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Bombay HCAPPLN/2676/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioners withdrew their application. The Court dismissed the husband's application (petitioner 1) as withdrawn. It allowed the remaining applicants' anticipatory bail application as vague allegations would cause undue trial.
What did the court decide?
Application of applicant No.1 disposed off as withdrawn. Application allowed in terms of prayer clause (B-1) to the extent of applicant Nos.2 to 7.