1858-23.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE…
Application allowed based on respondent No. 2's consent to full and final settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 986-appln 1858-23.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1858 OF 2023
Subhash Shyamrao Pawar and another
.. Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another
.. Respondents
Mr. Adinath B. Jagtap, Advocate for the Applicants.
Mr. P N. Kutti, APP for Respondent No. 1.
Mr. Shubham Khoche, Advocate for Respondent No. 2.
CORAM : R. G. AVACHAT AND
KISHORE C. SANT, JJ.
DATED : 01st NOVEMBER, 2023.
PER COURT :-
.Learned counsel for respondent No. 2 (informant) submits that,
respondent No. 2 has received the amount towards full and final
settlement of his claim. He thus gives express consent to allow this
application.
2. The application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B).
( KISHORE C. SANT )( R. G. AVACHAT )
JUDGE JUDGE
P.S.B.
1 of 1
Subhash Shyamrao Pawar and another
The State of Maharashtra and another
R. G. AVACHAT
KISHORE C. SANT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court