Dismissed

M/S Ambika Buildcon Thr. Its Partner Shammi S/O Kanhaiyalal Mamtani and 2 Others v. Varsha W/O Suresh Kumar Tanwani

Bombay HC20 Mar 2023APL/1373/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Nagpur allowed the withdrawal of three Criminal Applications (A.P.L.) with liberty to produce the order of a Division Bench from a related Criminal Writ Petition to substantiate facts before the revisional Court.

What did the court decide?

Leaves to withdraw applications granted; liberty to produce order dated 03.03.2021 in C.W.P. No. 571 of 2020 granted.

M/S Ambika Buildcon Thr. Its Partner Shammi S/O Kanhaiyalal Mamtani and 2 Others Vs Varsha W/O Suresh Kumar Tanwani — Bombay HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 17.apl.1373.2022+2

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

¶3

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.1373 OF 2022 M/s. Ambika Buildcon through its Partner and ors.

¶4

.VS.

¶5

Mrs. Varsha W/o. Suresh Kumar Tanwani WITH

¶6

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.1371 OF 2022 M/s. Ambika Buildcon through its Partner and ors. .VS.

¶7

Mr Suresh Kumar S/o. Kishanchand Tanwani WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.1372 OF 2022 M/s. Ambika Buildcon through its Partner and ors. .VS.

¶8

Mr Suresh Kumar S/o. Kishanchand Tanwani

¶9

_______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.

¶10

Mr S. S. Dewani, Advocate for the applicant Mr S. N. Bhattad, Advocate for the non-applicants

¶11

CORAM : G.A. SANAP, J. DATE : MARCH 20, 2023.

¶12

Learned Advocate for the applicant after, arguing the matter for some time, seeks leave to withdraw all three applications with liberty to produce before the revisional Court the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Criminal Writ Petition No. 571 of 2020 dated 03.03.2021.

¶13

2 17.apl.1373.2022+2

¶14

In my view, the liberty, as prayed for, can be granted because the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court can be relied upon by the party, if permitted under the law to substantiate particular issue or fact in issue or relevant fact. Therefore, the applications stand disposed of, as withdrawn.

¶15

Liberty to produce the copy of the order dated 03.03.2021 passed in Criminal Writ Petition No. 571 of 2020 is granted. Learned Additional Sessions Judge shall take said order into consideration, depending upon the relevance of the said order, in accordance with law.

¶16

Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

¶17

(G. A. SANAP, J.)

¶18

Namrata

¶19

Signed By:NAMRATA YOGESH DHARKAR P. A. High Court Nagpur Signing Date:20.03.2023 19:07

M/S Ambika Buildcon Thr. Its Partner Shammi S/O Kanhaiyalal Mamtani and 2 Others v. Varsha W/O Suresh Kumar Tanwani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Ambika Buildcon Thr. Its Partner Shammi S/O Kanhaiyalal Mamtani and 2 Others v. Varsha W/O Suresh Kumar Tanwani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pundlik S/O Natthuji Landge Vs State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. City Kotwali, Amravati

Ajay S/O Jainarayan Jaiswal Vs the State of Maharashtra through Police Officer, P. S. Washim and Another

Swati Ashokrao Dawane Vs the State of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Gadchiroli Tah. and Dist.Gadchiroli

Gajendra S/O Govindrao Waikar Vs Laxmi W/O Gajendra Waikar

M/S Ambika Buildcon Thr. Its Partner Shammi S/O Kanhaiyalal Mamtani and 2 Others Vs Mr. Suresh Kumar S/O Kishanchan Tanwani

M/S Ambika Buildcon Thr. Its Partner Shammi S/O Kanhaiyalal Mamtani and 2 Others Vs Mr. Suresh Kumar S/O Kishanchan Tanwani