Criminal Appeal rendered infructuous as appellants were granted regular bail by the trial court. Appeal dismissed without engaging substantive issues.
Appeal dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
955-APEAL-623-2023.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.623 OF 2023
DIGAMBAR ASARAM ARDAD AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Appellants : Mr. R. M. Deshmukh
APP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2: Mrs. G. L. Deshpande
Advocate for Respondent No. 3 : Mr. A. P. Lohade
(appointed)
...
CORAM:R.M. JOSHI, J
DATE:NOVEMBER 02, 2023
PER COURT :
1.Learned Counsel for the Appellants states that
Appellants are granted regular bail by the trial Court.
Hence, Appeal has become infructuous.
2.In view of above, appeal stands dismissed as
infructuous.
3.Fees of Mr. A. P. Lohade, learned Counsel
appointed for Respondent No. 3, is quantified @ Rs.
6,000/- (Rupees Six Thousand Only) to be paid by High
Court Legal Service Sub-Committee, Aurangabad.
Malani
Page 1 of 1
DIGAMBAR ASARAM ARDAD AND ANOTHER
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
R.M. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court