The High Court of Judicature at Aurangabad dismissed the withdrawn anticipatory bail application. Counsel for the applicant sought withdrawal on instructions after the Court had previously shown disinclination to grant relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
aba1176.23.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1176 OF 2023
Punjab Prasadrao Gaikwad
Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & another
Respondents
Mr. S. K. Chavan, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. G. O. Wattamwar, APP for the State. Mr. S. J. Salunke, Advocate for the informant.
CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 1st NOVEMBER, 2023.
PER COURT :
applicant yesterday, learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks withdrawal of the application.
( R. M. JOSHI)
Judge
dyb
Punjab Prasadrao Gaikwad
The State of Maharashtra & another
R. M. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court