Appeal against an order quashing an FIR primarily under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court held the appeal to be infructuous as the underlying matter was already disposed of by a prior quashing order.
The criminal appeal is disposed off as infructuous based on the concurrent quashing of the FIR.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1 17 APEAL 246-18.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 246 OF 2018
Sunil Sopan Madane .. Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr
.. Respondents
Adv. Aditi Rajput a/w Adv. Prashant Raul i/b Adv. S.P. Kadam, for the appellant Adv. Rahul Arote, for respondent no.2. Mr. N.B. Patil, APP for the State.
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 3rd APRIL 2023
P.C:-
1 The learned counsel for the appellant state that the division bench of this court in criminal writ petition no. 114 of 2018 has quashed and set aside, the FIR registered vide Crime No. 277 of 2017 with Phaltan City Police station, which had invoked the provisions of IPC as well as Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The said order dated 29/03/2022 is taken on record.
2 In the wake of the above order the appeal has been rendered as infructous and is accordingly disposed off.
( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)
Ashish Mhaske
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Division BenchRelied on¶1
Criminal Writ Petition No. 114 of 2018
Sunil Sopan Madane
The State of Maharashtra
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
