(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
The appeal stands dismissed as infructuous due to the disposal of Regular Civil Appeal No.26 of 2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
917-ao-92-2016.odt
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
APEAL FROM ORDER NO.92 OF 2016
MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY
LTD. THROUGH IT S EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, NANDURBAR
VERSUS
MALIK AKTAR BAGWAN
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Joshi Subhash H
CORAM : S.G. MEHARE, J.
DATED : SEPTEMBER 13, 2023
PER COURT:-
1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that Regular Civil Appeal No.26 of 2016 has been decided on merit; hence, this appeal has become infructuous.
2. The appeal from order stands dismissed as infructuous.
(S.G. MEHARE, J.)
Mujaheed//
MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD. THROUGH IT S EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, NANDURBAR
MALIK AKTAR BAGWAN
S.G. MEHARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court