This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
k 1/2 4 ao 71.07 as.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.71 OF 2007 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.108 OF 2007 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.71 OF 2007
M/S. VARUN ENTERPRISES ....APPELLANT/APPLICANT VS MR. ABDUL RASHEED MOHD. ALI PATEL & ANR. ....RESPONDENTS … WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.146 OF 2008 M/S. VARUN ENTERPRISES ....PETITIONER VS MR. ABDUL RASHEED MOHD. ALI PATEL & ANR. ....RESPONDENTS … WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1637 OF 2013 MR. ABDUL RASHEED MOHD. ALI PATEL & ANR. ....PETITIONERS VS MUKESH BAJAJ & ORS. ....RESPONDENTS … Mr. Yogesh Dandekar i/b M/s. M. Tripathi & Co. for the Appellant/Applicant in AO, CAA and CP. Mr. Nitin Mulye for Petitioner in WP. Mr. G.S. Hegde, Senior Advocate a/w Ms. Pinky Bhansali i/b M/s. G.S. Hegde & Associates for Respondent No.2.
1/2
katkam
k 2/2 4 ao 71.07 as.doc
CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 04, 2023.
P.C.:
2 In view of the withdrawal of the Appeal from Order, the Civil Application No.108 of 2007 is also disposed of accordingly.
3 The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner in Contempt Petition No.146 of 2008 submits that Petitioner has instructed him to withdraw the Contempt Petition and has placed on record letter dated 30 August 2023. The said letter is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. The Contempt Petition No.146 of 2008 is dismissed as withdrawn.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)
2/2
katkam
M/S. Varun Enterprises
Mr. Abdul Rasheed Mohd. Ali Patel
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
