Appeal against an impugned order was allowed to be withdrawn by the appellants with liberty to pursue regularization, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal and disposal of the interim application.
Leave granted to withdraw appeal with liberty to pursue regularization proposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
40-AO-288-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 288 OF 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3677 OF 2023
Versus
Municipal Corporation For Greater Mumbai Though R-Central Ward, Mumbai. ...Respondent
Mr. Rupesh R. Lanjekar, for Appellants. Mrs. Smita Tondwalkar, for Respondent - MCGP.
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 05, 2023.
P.C.:
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)
Digitally signed by SAJAKALI SAJAKALI LIYAKAT LIYAKAT JAMADAR JAMADAR Date:2023.09.06 13:30:55 +0530
S. L. JAMADAR
Kirit Ratilal Shah
Shripal Kirit Shah
Municipal Corporation For Greater Mumbai
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
