The High Court at Bombay disposed of an anticipatory bail application for want of prosecution, citing non-submission of the charge-sheet by the Investigating Officer.
Application disposed of for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
28-ABA941-2021.DOC
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI
Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2023.08.22 10:44:28 +0530
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 941 OF 2021
Mrs. Sherbanu Gullhaider Sayyed and ors. ...Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra …Respondent
None for the Applicants. Mrs. Ashwini Takalkar, APP for the State. Mr. Sandesh Rane, PSI, Waliv Police Station, present.
CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED: 21st AUGUST, 2023
PC:-
sheet has been lodged on 28th February, 2022.
for want of prosecution.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application stands disposed for want of prosecution due to non-availability of the report of Investigating Officer.
Santosh Subhash Kulkarni
The State of Maharashtra
N. J. JAMADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
