The High Court at Bombay granted leave to the applicant to withdraw his anticipatory bail application as he had been arrested in the intervening period. The main application and all interim applications were disposed of as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw application; main application and interim applications disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
36-ABA1225-2022.DOC
SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI
Santosh
Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2023.08.22 17:41:10 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1225 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1760 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1761 OF 2022
Kamlesh Rajendrakumar Mehta ...Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra …Respondent
Ms. Falguni Brahmbhatt, for the Applicant. Mrs. Ashwini Takalkar, APP for the State.
Mr. Sandeep Varpale, API D. N. Nagar Police Station, present. PSI Vaibhav Khade, present.
CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED: 21st AUGUST, 2023
PC:-
withdraw the application as the applicant has, in the intervening period, been arrested.
Leave granted.
applications do not survive and stand disposed.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]
1/1
Kamlesh Rajendrakumar Mehta
State of Maharashtra
N. J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
