The applicant's anticipatory bail application was allowed to be withdrawn without substantive discussion on merits or application of specific statutes by the single judge.
Anticipatory bail application allowed to be withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed URMILAPRAMOD by URMILAPRAMODINGALEDate: INGALE 2023.01.1317:22:31 +0530
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.64 OF 2023
Mr. Ashutosh Vijay Pimple ..Applicant VS. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent
Mr. Shambhu Jha, for the Applicant. Mr. S. H. Yadav, APP for the State.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : JANUARY 13, 2023
P.C. :
At the request of learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, the anticipatory bail application is allowed to be withdrawn.
(M. S. KARNIK, J.)
1/1
Urmila Ingale
The State of Maharashtra
M. S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
