Sugra Salim Ahamed Siddiqui and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed anticipatory bail applications for two applicants accused of verbal abuse without injury marks, rejecting bail for a third applicant accused of causing a fracture injury. Bail conditions included furnishing a bond and cooperating with police.
What did the court decide?
Anticipatory bail allowed for Applicants 1 and 2 subject to furnishing a PR bond of Rs.25,000/- each and complying with standard conditions; application rejected for Applicant 3.
What the court decided
910.aba.30-23.doc
PMB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.30 OF 2023
PRADNYA MAKARAND BHOGALE
Digitally signed by PRADNYA MAKARAND BHOGALE Date: 2023.01.16 10:28:15 +0530
Sugra Salim Ahamed Siddiqui and ors. ..Applicants VS. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent
Ms. Kavita N. Durgapal a/w Mr. Manoj R. Gowd for the Applicants.
Mr. S. H. Yadav, APP for the State.
Mr. Prakash Ghadge, PSI, Dharavi Police Station is present.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : JANUARY 12, 2023
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to applicants Nos.1 and 2 considering the absence of injuries on the complainant's wife and their alleged role of verbal abuse.
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to applicant No.3 who is alleged to have caused fracture injury to the complainant with a bamboo stick.
Whether custodial interrogation is required for the applicants given the nature of the allegations and injuries sustained.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sugra Salim Ahamed Siddiqui
- applicant
Noor Bano Sagheer Ahmed Siddiqui
- applicant
Gulam Hussain Mohammed Raza Shaikh
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court