Allowed

Swapnil Ramesh Pawar v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC17 Oct 2023ABA/577/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this anticipatory bail application, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay made the interim bail order dated 4 March 2021 absolute, given that no further custodial interrogation seemed warranted and the co-accused had been released on bail.

What did the court decide?

The interim bail order of 4 March 2021 was made absolute. The applicant's deposit of Rs. 1 Lakh abides by the final decision in the Special Case.

Swapnil Ramesh Pawar Vs the State of Maharashtra — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

2023:BHC-AS:31267

¶2

13 aba 577 of 2021.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.577 OF 2021

¶4

Swapnil Ramesh Pawar versus The State of Maharashtra

¶5

… Applicant

¶6

… Respondent

¶7

Mr. Pandit Kasar, for Applicant. Mr. M.G.Patil, APP for State.

¶8

CORAM: N.J.JAMADAR, J. DATE : 17 OCTOBER 2023

¶9

P.C.

¶10

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

¶11

This is an application for pre-arrest bail in connection with C.R.No.II-08

¶12

of 2017 registered with Kongaon Police Station, Bhiwandi, Dist. Thane, for the offences punishable under Section 138 of Electricity Act, 2002 and under Section 427 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

By an order dated 4 March 2021, this Court was persuaded to grant interim protection. The applicant had undertaken to deposit an amount of Rs.1 Lakh.

¶14

The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has deposited the said amount of Rs.1 Lakh. There is no clarity as to whether the coaccused Kishor Nimbalkar, who was the partner of the applicant, has deposited a sum of Rs.4,78,000/- within six months from 4 December 2020. As recorded in the order

¶15

of even date passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge while releasing the said

¶16

SSP 1/2

¶17

13 aba 577 of 2021.doc

¶18

accused on bail. At this length of time, this question ought not detain the court as the applicant as deposited the amount of Rs.1 Lakh.

¶19

It seems that the co-accused Jayram, in whose name the electricity connection stands, and Kishor Nimbalkar, managing partner of the applicant were arrested and have since been released on bail. In the circumstances, having regard to

¶20

the nature of the accusation, further custodial interrogation of the applicant does not seem to be warranted. I am, therefore, inclined to make the order of interim bail dated 4 March 2021 absolute.

¶21

Accordingly, the order granting interim bail dated 4 March 2021 is made

¶22

absolute.

¶23

The amount of Rs.1 Lakh deposited by the applicant in the Court of Session on 26 March 2021 shall abide the final decision in the Special Case.

¶24

The application stands disposed.

¶25

SSP 2/2

Swapnil Ramesh Pawar v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Swapnil Ramesh Pawar v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abhishek Prashar Son of Pushkar Prashar and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra

Sutapa Kole Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Nasimuddin Hakimuddin Shaikh and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra

Ashutosh Ashok Lokhande Vs State of Maharashtra

Kumar Baddu Pawar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Anand Goel(Goyal) Vs State of Maharashtra