Allowed

Anand Goel(Goyal) v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC17 Oct 2023ABA/1152/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Bombay granted pre-arrest bail to the applicant facing charges of cheating and criminal conspiracy. The court noted the dispute originated from non-payment of transport charges but observed that an interim protection was already in force and a quashing petition had been filed. Bail was granted on a personal bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

The applicant be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 30,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount upon arrest.

Anand Goel(Goyal) Vs State of Maharashtra — Cheating and Forgery | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

24-aba-1152-2023.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1152 OF 2023

¶4

Anand Goel (Goyal) ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents

¶5

Mr. Shyam Dewani a/w. Mr. Chirag Chanani, for the Applicants Smt. Ashwini Takalkar, APP, for the Respondent/State. Mr. Ajay Chavan, API, Kalamboli police station.

¶6

CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : OCTOBER 17, 2023

¶7

P.C.:

¶8

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State.

¶9

This application is preferred seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with C.R. No. 210 of 2023 registered at Taloja police station for the offences punishable under sections 406 and 420 read with 34 of Indian penal Code, 1860.

¶10

The first informant lodged the report with the allegations that M/s. Balaji Transport Corporation of which the applicants are Directors and/or persons responsible for the affairs of the said entity had induced him to provide transport services and did not pay the charges to the tune of Rs. 62,93,682/- and thereby deceived him.

¶11

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the

Vishal Parekar

...1

24-aba-1152-2023.doc

applicant has settled the dispute with the first informant. Attention of the court was invited to the affidavit of the first informant wherein the first informant claimed to have received the outstanding amount of Rs. 42 lakhs. The learned counsel submitted that pursuant to the settlement arrived at between the parties, the application for quashing of the prosecution has been filed vide Writ Petition No. 1477 of 2023 and by order dated 27^th April, 2023 the investigating officer has been directed not to proceed against the petitioner therein in any manner.

¶16

Prima facie, the allegations in the first information report indicate that the genesis of the offence is in a dispute over non payment of the charges for providing transport services.

¶17

In the aforesaid view of the matter, since the interim protection is in operation since 19^th April, 2023, I am inclined to exercise the discretion in favour of the applicant.

¶18

In the event of arrest in C.R. No. 210 of 2023 registered at Taloja police station, the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a P.R. bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount.

¶19

The applicant shall cooperate with the investigation and attend Taloja police station as and when directed.

¶20

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence

Vishal Parekar

...2

24-aba-1152-2023.doc

and give threat or inducement to first informant, any of the prosecution witnesses or any person acquainted with the facts of the case.

¶25

The applicant shall regularly attend the proceedings before the jurisdictional Court.

¶26

It is clarified that these prima facie observations are confined

¶27

to determine entitlement to pre-arrest bail only.

¶28

Application disposed.

¶29

(N. J. JAMADAR, J.)

¶30

Vishal Parekar

¶31

...3

Anand Goel(Goyal) v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anand Goel(Goyal) v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abhishek Prashar Son of Pushkar Prashar and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra

Sutapa Kole Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Nasimuddin Hakimuddin Shaikh and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra

Swapnil Ramesh Pawar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ashutosh Ashok Lokhande Vs State of Maharashtra

Kumar Baddu Pawar Vs the State of Maharashtra