Sharad Haridas Dhekale v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What did the court decide?
leave to withdraw application allowed; application disposed of accordingly.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
leave to withdraw application allowed; application disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
912.aba.390-23.doc
PMB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed by PRADNYA PRADNYA MAKARAND MAKARAND BHOGALE BHOGALE Date: 2023.02.14 17:22:41 +0530
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.390 OF 2023
Sharad Haridas Dhekale ..Applicant VS. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent
Adv. Aniket Ujjwal Nikam a/w Adv. Amit Icham a/w Adv. Piyush Toshniwal a/w Adv. Aashish Satpute for the Applicant.
Ms. P. N. Dabholkar, APP for the State.
Mr. Rajendra Rathod, PSI, Mohol Police Station, Solapur Rural is present.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : FEBRUARY 14, 2023
P.C. :
1. Learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this application.
2. The application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
(M. S. KARNIK, J.)
1/1
Sharad Haridas Dhekale
The State of Maharashtra
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court