Disposed
Anjana Dinesh Patil v. State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCIA/124/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
502. ia 124.23.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
URMILA Digitally signedby URMILA PRAMOD PRAMODINGALE INGALE Date: 2023.02.1410:05:51 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 124 OF 2023 IN
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 769 OF 2021
Anjana Dinesh Patil ..Applicant VS. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent
Mr. Mayank Tripathi i/b Hedgehog and Fox LLP, for Applicant.
Mr. S. V. Gavand, APP for the State.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : FEBRUARY 13, 2023
P.C. :
1. Not on board. Taken on board.
2. This is an application for extension of time to furnish
surety. For the reasons mentioned in the application, time to furnish surety is extended by a period of 4 weeks from today.
3. The interim application is disposed of.
(M. S. KARNIK, J.)
1/1
Anjana Dinesh Patil
The State of Maharashtra
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court