Surekha Shreeram Garde v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant's anticipatory bail application was disposed of as infructuous because the applicant had been arrested in the intervening period, rendering the request moot.
The applicant's anticipatory bail application was disposed of as infructuous because the applicant had been arrested in the intervening period, rendering the request moot.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14-aba-2976-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2976 OF 2023
Surekha Shreeram Garde ...Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents
Mr. Ganesh Sovani a/w. Ms. Darshana Mandhe, for the Applicant Mr. M.G. Patil, APP, for the Respondent/State. Mr. Harshad Sathe a/w. Ms. Ankita Pawar and Mr. Harshvardhan Khambete, for Respondent No. 2.
CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 1, 2023
P.C.:
APP for the State.
disposed having been rendered infructuous.
Vishal Parekar
...1
Surekha Shreeram Garde
The State of Maharashtra
Anr.
N. J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court