Allowed

Khandu @ Khanderao Bhausaheb Shendge v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC24 Jan 2023ABA/132/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

On 24 January 2023, a single-judge bench allowed an anticipatory bail application filed by the applicant apprehending arrest in a U.A.P.S. case involving assault and affray charges. The applicant was granted release on bail upon furnishing a bond and meeting a specific condition regarding compensation to the injured.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; release on bail upon furnishing a P.R. Bond of Rs. 25,000 with sureties and payment of Rs. 20,000 medical expenses to the injured.

Khandu @ Khanderao Bhausaheb Shendge Vs State of Maharashtra — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

31-ABA-132-2023.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 132 OF 2023

¶4

… Khandu @ Khanderao Bhausaheb Shendge Applicant

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Maharashtra … Respondent

¶7

Mr. R.T. Kotali for the Applicant. Mr. Amit Palkar, APP for the State.

¶8

CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATED : 24 JANUARY 2023

¶9

P.C. :-

¶10

. This is an application filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for anticipatory bail.

¶11

The applicant is apprehending his arrest in Crime No. 111 of 2022 registered at Shirur Police Station, Pune for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 326, 143, 147, 148, 149, 504, 506 of Indian Penal Code.

¶12

I have heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the State.

¶13

According to the prosecution, on the date of incident which took place on 16 February 2022, the present applicant and other co-

Kanchan P Dhuri

1 / 2

31-ABA-132-2023.odt

accused assaulted the injured Sukhdeo Waghmode by iron rod, sticks etc. on account of some trivial disputes, which took place between them, one day prior to the incident.

¶18

I have perused the statement of the injured. The applicant at the time of alleged incident was not armed with any weapon. The alleged injury to the injured is not attributed to the present applicant. There are no criminal antecedents.

¶19

Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the present applicant. In the result, the following order is passed :

¶20

(i) Application is allowed.

¶21

(ii) In the event of arrest of the applicant - Khandu @ Khanderao Bhausaheb Shendge in Crime No. 111 of 2022 registered at Shirur Police Station, Pune for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 326, 143, 147, 148, 149, 504, 506 of Indian Penal Code, he shall be released on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount, subject to payment of Rs.20,000/- by the applicant to the injured towards medical expenses, within a period of three weeks from the date of uploading of order.

¶22

Digitally signed KANCHAN by KANCHAN PRASHANT PRASHANT DHURI DHURI Date: 2023.03.23 19:14:17 +0530

¶23

Kanchan P Dhuri

¶24

2 / 2

Khandu @ Khanderao Bhausaheb Shendge v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Khandu @ Khanderao Bhausaheb Shendge v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prakash Motiram Lilke Vs State of Maharashtra

Raosaheb Sukhdev Katore Vs State of Maharashtra

Deepak Krishna Kadam Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mayuresh Ganesh Karale Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ramij Razzak Dange Vs State of Maharashtra

Hemangi Abhijeet Bhosale Vs State of Maharashtra