Allowed

Salim Mohin Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC16 Jan 2023ABA/129/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court granted pre-arrest bail to the applicant in an anticipatory bail application. Bail granted under police bond with condition to deposit Rs.25,000 with the Magistrate within 8 weeks and appear at the police station on two dates.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on police bond of Rs.15,000 with sureties; order to deposit Rs.25,000 with Magistrate within 8 weeks; undertaking not to tamper with evidence.

Salim Mohin Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

Urmila Ingale

¶2

aba 129.23.doc

¶3

Digitally signed by URMILA URMILAPRAMOD PRAMOD INGALE INGALE Date:2023.01.16 18:33:20 +0530

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.129 OF 2023

¶6

Salim Mohin Shaikh ..Applicant VS. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent

¶7

Mr. Anil S. Kamble, for the Applicant. Ms. A. A. Takalkar, APP for the State. PSI- Mr. B.D. Pawar, Kalyan Police Station is present.

¶8

CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.

¶9

DATE : JANUARY 16, 2023

¶10

P.C. :

¶11

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP.

¶12

2. This is an application for pre-arrest bail. The applicant is apprehending arrest in connection with C.R.No. 544 of 2022 dated 08/11/2022 registered with Kalyan Police Station for offence punishable under sections 376(2), 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

¶13

3. The prosecutrix alleged that not only the applicant had forcible physical relations with her but even extorted money

¶14

1/3

¶15

Urmila Ingale

¶16

aba 129.23.doc

¶17

from her to the tune of Rs. 15 lakhs.

¶18

4. Today, an affidavit has been filed by the prosecutrix who is personally present in the Court. The investigating officer has identified the prosecutrix. In the affidavit she has stated that there was some misunderstanding on the trifle issues with the applicant and out of anger, the FIR has been filed. She admits the physical relations between the parties since 2018. The applicant is married. The prosecutrix is also married. They developed friendship and physical relations is an outcome of that friendship. In view of the stand taken by the prosecutrix, the custodial interrogation of the applicant is not required. Hence, the following order.

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

(a) In the event of arrest of the applicant in connection with C.R.No. 544 dated 08/11/2022 registered with Kalyan Police Station, the applicantSalim Mohin Shaikh be released on bail on his furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount;

¶21

2/3

¶22

Urmila Ingale

¶23

aba 129.23.doc

¶24

(b) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with facts of case so as to dissuade him from disclosing the facts to Court or any Police Officer and should not tamper with evidence;

¶25

(c) The applicant to report to the investigating officer on 19^th and 20^th January 2023 bewteen 11.00 a.m. and 1.00 p.m.

¶26

(d) The applicant has shown his readiness to deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- with the jurisdictional Magistrate within a period of 8 weeks from today which deposit shall abide by the final order that may passed by the competent Court. Statement is accepted.

¶27

5. The anticipatory bail application is disposed of.

¶28

(M. S. KARNIK, J.)

¶29

3/3

Salim Mohin Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Salim Mohin Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashutosh Vijay Pimple Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Virbhadra Vikram Singh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Abhishek Singh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Momeen Ali MD Khan Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Sanjay Hiro Hiranandani Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bashbhaie Ismile Shaikh Vs State of Maharashtra