The petitioner sought unconditional withdrawal of the writ petition. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16-ASWP-9920-2015.DOC
Arun
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9920 OF 2015
ATC Telectom Tower …Petitioner Versus Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution …Respondents Company Ltd & Anr
Mr Amit Khariwar , with Mr Dhande, i/b DH Law Asociates, for the Petitioner.
Ms Heena Shaikh , i/b MV Kini & Co, for the Respondents.
CORAM G.S. Patel & V. G. Bisht, JJ. DATED: 28th June 2022
PC:-
ARUN RAMCHNDRA SANKPAL
Digitally signed by ARUN RAMCHNDRA SANKPAL Date: 2022.06.28 18:17:19 +0530
1. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner seeks leave to unconditionally withdraw the Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(V. G. Bisht, J)
(G. S. Patel, J)
Page 1 of 1 28th June 2022
ATC Telectom Tower
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd & Anr
G.S. Patel
V. G. Bisht
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
