6. It is this that was canvassed before the learned Single Judge and we will proceed first to analyse this short order. At least some facts are not in dispute. There were four brothers, RB Jain, JB Jain, PB Jain and one SP Jain, since deceased. The surviving three Jain brothers made a claim against the daughters of JB Jain. The Jain family apparently owned several properties including one at survey No. 82 at Versova, Andheri. By all accounts this is a substantial property of 5136.40 sq mtrs. Disputes arose between the parties and this led to a suit being filed in a Civil Court in Amritsar. There, the parties were categorised into Groups A and B and the suit was compromised. The Group A parties were entitled to a certain portion of the Versova property and the Group B parties were entitled to the other portion. This property was to be developed. Disputes arose between the parties regarding the development and specifically in regard to the payment to be made to the parties inter se and to the developer. At this point, the parties agreed upon the appointment of Rajnish Jain, also the Respondents say, by consent. This is now the canvas of the case of the Respondents represented by Mr Patel before us. Their case is that a sealed envelope containing documents was sent to Mr Rajnish Jain. The packet contained a Memorandum of Understanding-cum-Private Partition
