The Divisional Commissioner reported that the petitioner's GPF balance and interest were transferred, resolving the grievance. The petition was disposed of as the petitioner's complaint no longer survived.
Petition disposed of as grievance regarding GPF release was met.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
904-WP.9538-21.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
904 WRIT PETITION NO.9538 OF 2021
VALMIK MAROTI SHINDE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Ms. Kalyankar Vaishali R.
AGP for Respondent/s-State : Mr. S. G. Karlekar.
Adv. for Respondent No.2 : Mr. V. C. Patil h/f Mr. U. B. Bondar.
Adv. for Res. No.4 : Mr. G. K. Chinchole h/f Mr. V. M. Vibhute.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, AND
S. G. MEHARE, JJ.
DATE : 11.02.2022
P. C.:-
1. In furtherance of Order dated 05.01.2022 the Divisional
Commissioner, Aurangabad Division has submitted its report in
a sealed envelop through the Registrar of this Court. The said
envelop is opened in Court. The report dated 17.01.2022 duly
signed by the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad is taken on
record.
2.The Divisional Commissioner in the concluding
paragraph of its report has stated that, the principle amount of
Rs.75,387/- and interest amount of Rs.1,07,219/-(total
2 904-WP.9538-21.odt
amount of Rs.1,82,606/-) is transferred to the GPF amount of
Mr. Valmik Maroti Shinde and now he can withdraw the said
amount as per the Maharashtra General Provident Fund Rules,
1998. It is further stated that, the petitioner’s grievances are
complied with before 05.01.2022, i.e. the date of order of this
Court. It seemed to the concerned Authority that, the problem
has been precipitated due to wrongly placed communication by
Zilla Parishad, Parbhani to Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad instead
of Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad and subsequently wrong
acceptance of the amount by Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. The
Divisional Commissioner has gracefully accepted the said
inadvertent and unintentional mistake on behalf of his sub-
ordinates and has expressed his regrets for the delay caused in
this issue. The report dated 17.01.2022 is accepted.
3.In view of the categorical statements made by the
Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad, the grievance of the
petitioner in the present petition is met out.
The learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions
fairly submitted that, grievance of the petitioner herein as of
today does not survive.
904-WP.9538-21.odt
3
Petition is accordingly disposed off.
(S. G. MEHARE, J.) (A. S. GADKARI, J.)
vmk/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's grievance regarding non-release of GPF funds has been met.
Valmik Maroti Shinde
The State of Maharashtra
A. S. Gadkari
S. G. Mehare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court