This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
Digitally URMILA signed byURMILAPRAMOD PRAMOD INGALE INGALE Date:2022.04.01 16:04:31 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 946 OF 2020
Shri Vijay Waman Yelwande.. Petitioner
vs.
State of Maharashtra and ors...Respondents
Mr. Viraj Hake i/b Mr. Sagar Kursija, for Petitioner.
Mr. A.A. Palkar, APP for State-Respondent.
CORAM : M.S.KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : 01st APRIL, 2022
P.C.:-
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that due to paucity
of time, the petition is rendered infructuous. The petition is disposed
of as infructuous.
(M.S.KARNIK, J.)
1
Vijay Waman Yelwande
State of Maharashtra
M.S.Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court