This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9.wp.911-20.doc
PMB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed by PRADNYA PRADNYA MAKARAND MAKARAND BHOGALE BHOGALE Date: 2022.04.01 16:15:24 +0530
WRIT PETITION NO. 911 OF 2020
Aruna Sharad Salunkhe .. Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr. Anand S. Patil for the petitioner.
Mr. A.A. Palkar, APP for State.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : APRIL 1, 2022
P.C.:-
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
present writ petition is rendered infructuous with the passage of time. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(M.S. KARNIK, J.)
1/1
Aruna Sharad Salunkhe
The State of Maharashtra
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
