The High Court of Bombay disposed of criminal Writ Petition No. 90 of 2022. Petitioner's counsel sought discharge, kept contentions open, and the petition was dismissed without engaging in substantive reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
39-WP-90-2022.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 90 OF 2022
Suryadevkumar Shyamsundar Sinh … Petitioner Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another … Respondents
Mr. Priyal Sarda for the Petitioner. Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the State.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND N.R. BORKAR, JJ. DATED : 6 JULY 2022
P.C. :-
The learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner will avail remedy of seeking discharge and state that the contentions be kept open. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of.
( N.R. BORKAR, J. )
( NITIN JAMDAR, J. )
Digitally signed KANCHAN by KANCHAN PRASHANT PRASHANT DHURI DHURI Date: 2022.07.12 10:26:42 +0530
Kanchan P Dhuri
1 / 1
Suryadevkumar Shyamsundar Sinh
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jindar
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
