Application seeking quashing of FIR filed for consent withdrawal. Court disposed of the application since parties had entered consent terms before Family Court and applicant intended to file fresh petition based on consent.
Application disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Priya Soparkar 1 4 apl 349-22-cr
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.349 OF 2022
PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR
Aditya Kumar Jitendra Singh … Applicant
V/s.
Digitally signed by PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR Date: 2022.07.08 15:16:36 +0530
Rupa Mayank Singh and anr. … Respondents
Mr.Chandrashekhar Yadav i/by M/s Karmarkar & Associates, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr.J.P.Yagnik, APP for Respondent No.2/State.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND
N.R. BORKAR, JJ.
DATE : 5 JULY, 2022.
P.C.:-
(N.R. BORKAR, J.)
(NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
Priya Rajesh Soparkar
Aditya Kumar Jitendra Singh
Rupa Mayank Singh
Nitin Jamdar
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
