Petitioner filed an unnumbered criminal petition (^{} in 2013. Court allowed it on grounds of out-of-court settlement between parties in 2015. No substantive legal issues addressed.
Proceeding dismissed due to parties having amicably settled the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssm 1 907-wp809.13.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 809 OF 2013
Tulsidas Assudomal Mengharajani …..Petitioner
Vs.
Sonia Tulsidas Mengharajani & Anr. …..Respondents
Mr. Ramesh Ramamurthy a/w Saikumar Ramamurthy for the Petitioner. Mr. Ajay Patil APP, for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 15th JULY, 2022.
P.C.:-
Mr. Ramamurthy, learned Advocate for the Petitioner, on
instructions submitted that, the parties herein have amicably settled the matter and have filed a consent terms in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune in the year 2015.
2 In view thereof, present Petition as of today does not survive and is accordingly disposed off.
Digitally signed SANJIV by SANJIVSHARNAPPA SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR MASHALKAR Date: 2022.07.16 16:38:27 +0530
1/1
Tulsidas Assudomal Mengharajani
Sonia Tulsidas Mengharajani
Respondent-State
A. S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
