Allowed

Prashant Appa Awale v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC15 Jul 2022IA/1407/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an interim application for suspension of sentence and bail pending appeal, this single-judge High Court granted bail, noting forensic evidence excluded the applicant as the biological father of the child born to the victim.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail on P.R. bond of Rs.25,000/- with one or two local sureties in like amount, with specific attendance and conduct conditions.

Prashant Appa Awale Vs State of Maharashtra and… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

ssm 1 12-ia1407.22.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1407 OF 2022

¶5

¶6

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 462 OF 2022

¶7

Prashant Appa Awale …..Applicant Vs. The State Of Maharashtra & Anr. …..Respondents

¶8

Mr. Ganesh Bhujbal for the Applicant. Mrs. Sharmila Kaushik APP, for the Respondent-State. Mr. Prashant D. Patil for the Respondent No.2.

¶9

CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 15^th JULY, 2022.

¶10

P.C.:-

¶11

This is an Application for suspension of sentence and releasing the Applicant on bail.

¶12

2 Applicant has been convicted for the offence under Section 3(a) punishable under Section 4(2) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, “POCSO Act” ), for the offence under Section 5(j)(ii) punishable under Section 6 of the POCSO Act and under Sections 376 and 376(3) of the Indian Penal Code (for short, “the IPC”) and is sentenced to suffer maximum rigorous imprisonment for 20 years by the Extra Joint Additional Sessions Judge, Karad in Special Case No.6 of 2021

¶13

1/3

¶14

ssm 2 12-ia1407.22.doc

¶15

by its Judgment and Order dated 22^nd April, 2022 .

¶16

3 Mr. Bhujbal, learned Advocate for the Applicant submitted that, the Applicant was released on bail during the pendency of trial and there is no report of breach of any of the bail conditions imposed upon him. He further submitted that, the Applicant has already deposited entire fine amount in the Registry of the Trial Court.

¶17

4 It is the prosecution case that, the Applicant committed forcible sexual intercourse with the victim who was a child as per the definition of Section 2(d) of the POCSO Act. The victim thereafter became pregnant and subsequently gave birth to a baby boy.

¶18

5 Perusal of evidence available on record clearly indicates that, there is a Forensic Report/DNA Report of the Blood sample of the Applicant and the victim. In the result of Analysis in the said report, the concerned Assistant Chemical Analyser has opined that, the Applicant is excluded to be biological father of baby boy of the victim. It thus, prima facie appears that, the Applicant may not be the sole perpetrator of the crime alleged against him.

¶19

6 In view of the above and after taking into consideration the fact that, the Applicant was on bail during the pendency of the trial, this Court is of the opinion that, during the pendency of present Appeal the substantive sentence imposed upon the Applicant can be suspended and he can be released on bail.

¶20

2/3

¶21

ssm 3 12-ia1407.22.doc

¶22

5 Hence, the following Order:-

¶23

(a) Applicant be released on bail in Special Case No.6 of 2021arising out of C.R. No. 487 of 2020 registered with Karad Taluka Police Station, on his furnishing P.R. bond of Rs.25,000/- with one or two local sureties in the like amount.

¶24

(b) After his release from Jail and till final disposal of present Appeal, the Applicant is directed to attend Karad Taluka Police Station, on every first Monday of the month initially for a period of one year and thereafter on every first Monday of every 3^rd month, i.e. 4 times in a year.

¶25

¶26

6 Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms.

¶27

(A.S. GADKARI, J.)

¶28

SANJIV Digitally signed bySANJIV SHARNAPPA SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR MASHALKAR Date: 2022.07.1917:44:04 +0530

¶29

3/3

Prashant Appa Awale v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prashant Appa Awale v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Navnit Ramavtar Yadav Vs the State of Maharashtra

Naresh Kumar S/O Hiralal Chotelal Vs the State of Maharashtra

Vijay Ramesh Mohite Vs State of Maharashtra

Tulsidas Assudomal Vs Sonia Tulsidas and Anr.

Dhananjay Murlidhar Patil and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bharat Laxman Pardhi Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.