The writ petition was dismissed because the petitioner failed to comply with the earlier direction given on 29 July 2022 to explain the reasons for not producing the prescribed documents, resulting in a last chance order.
The Writ Petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1-WP-597-2022.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 597 OF 2022
Rajesh Samaydin Chaudhari @ Gupta … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
… Respondents
None for the Petitioner. Mrs. S.D. Shinde, APP for the State.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND N.R. BORKAR, JJ. DATED : 5 AUGUST 2022
P.C. :-
“By way of last chance, to comply with the earlier direction, stand over to 5 August 2022. To be listed under the caption “For Dismissal”.”
( N.R. BORKAR, J. )
( NITIN JAMDAR, J. )
Digitally signed by KANCHAN KANCHAN PRASHANT PRASHANT DHURI DHURI Date: 2022.08.11 14:30:35 +0530
Kanchan P Dhuri
1 / 1
Rajesh Samaydin Chaudhari @ Gupta
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
