Petitioner sought habeas corpus for custody of a 13-year-old child. The Court held that pending Family Court proceedings for custody precluded extraordinary writ intervention and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
JPP
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1024 OF 2022
Nilesh Jitendra Mehta … Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
... Respondents
Ms. Rimpal Trivedi for the Petitioner Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the Respondent - State
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & N.R. BORKAR, JJ.
DATE : 4 AUGUST 2022
P.C. :-
The writ of habeas corpus is sought by the father of the girl child Tiyaa, who is now 13 years old, from the Respondent No.2 – the mother.
2
JPP
Family Court. Therefore, at this stage we find no warrant to presume that the Petitioner will not get any relief from the Family Court or that the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court is the only recourse.
N.R. BORKAR, J.
NITIN JAMDAR, J.
Digitally signed by JYOTI JYOTI PRAKASH PRAKASH PAWAR PAWAR Date:2022.08.10 12:12:43 +0530
Nilesh Jitendra Mehta
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Nitin Jamdar
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
