Ortho Clinical Diagnostics India Vs the Union of India and 3 Ors.

Sridharan sought leave of the court to withdraw the petition with liberty to raise all points including those that during the pre-consultation hearing all details were made available and the show cause notice was not warranted.

¶15

Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. All rights and contentions are kept open.

¶16

Reply to be filed within four weeks from today. Respondent No.3 – Adjudicating Authority, shall pass a reasoned order within 12 weeks from today and before that personal hearing shall be granted, notice whereof shall be communicated atleast seven working days in advance. If

Purti Parab

910-WP-56-2021.doc

2 / 2

the Adjudicating Authority does not accept any of the submissions of petitioner, then reasons why the Adjudicating Authority does not agree with petitioner should also be recorded.

¶21

We clarify that we have not made any observations on the

merits of the case.

(A.S. DOCTOR, J.)

( K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Purti Parab

Ortho Clinical Diagnostics India v. the Union of India and 3 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ortho Clinical Diagnostics India v. the Union of India and 3 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Global Offshore Services Limited Vs the Union of India through Its Secretary and 2 Ors.

PrafHul N. Vaghani Vs the State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors.

Drums Food International Pvt.Ltd. Vs the Union of India through the Secretary and 4 Ors.

Dharam Jumani Vs Assistant Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax and 2 Ors.

Bombay Mercantile Co-Operative Bank Ltd. Vs Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax and 5 Ors.

M/S. Asis India Infrastructure Ltd. Vs Union of India through Secretary and Ors.