Allowed

Bombay Mercantile Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax and 5 Ors.

Bombay HC15 Nov 2022WP/4791/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226, the petitioner bank challenged an attachment order. Relying on a prior Full Bench decision, the court allowed the petition requesting the quashing and lifting of the impugned attachment levied on the petitioner's office premises and disposed of the matter.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed to quash, lift, and set aside the attachment order dated 21st March 2022 and direct the Respondent to raise it on the petitioner's office premises.

Bombay Mercantile Co-Operative Bank Ltd. Vs Deputy… — Property and Title | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

435.1-WPL-27798-2022.doc

¶2

1 / 2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY PURTI PRASADPARAB ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶4

Digitally signed byPURTI PRASAD PARAB Date: 2023.02.01 14:12:08 +0530 WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 27798 OF 2022

¶5

Bombay Mercantile Co-operative Bank Ltd.

¶6

….Petitioner

¶7

V/s. Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax and Ors. …Respondents

¶8

¶9

Mr. Dharam Jumani i/b Ms. Chandrika Prajapati for Petitioner. Ms. Jyoti Chavan, AGP for Respondent No.1 – State.

¶10

¶11

CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & ARIF S. DOCTOR, JJ. DATED : 15^th NOVEMBER 2022

¶12

P.C. :

¶13

Both counsel states that the subject matter of the petition is squarely covered by the judgment of the Full Bench of this court in Jalgaon Janta Sahakari Bank Ltd. & Anr. vs. Joint Commissioner of Sales Tax Nodal

¶14

9, Mumbai & Anr.¹ . Ms. Chavan in fairness and as an officer of the court states that Sales Tax department claim arose after petitioner’s charge was registered and therefore court may pass such order as the court deems fit.

¶15

Accordingly, petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause – (a)

¶16

and (b) which reads as under :

¶17

a. that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari, or Writ in the nature of Certiorari, or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, and call for the records under order

¶18

1 Writ Petition No. 2935 of 2018 dated 30.08.2022

¶19

This order has been modified by Speaking to the Minutes of the Order dated 31/01/2023

¶20

Purti Parab

¶21

435.1-WPL-27798-2022.doc

¶22

2 / 2

¶23

dated 21^st March 2022 pursuant to which the impugned attachment is levied and after considering the legality of the impugned order of the attachment dated 21^st March 2002 (Exhibit A hereto) passed by the Respondent No.1 be pleased to quash, lift, raise and set aside the said attachment;

¶24

b. this Hon’ble Court Writ of Certiorari, or Writ in the nature of Certiorari, or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and directing Respondent No.1 to :

¶25

i. raise the impugned attachment levied to the order of attachment dated 21^st March 2022 on the office premises being Office No.541, Panchratna Building, 5^th Floor, Opera House, Mumbai – 400 004; &

¶26

ii. raise the impugned attachment levied to the order of attachment dated 21^st March 2022 on the office premises being Office No. 120, First Floor, A to Z Industrial Estate, Delisle Road, Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai – 400 013.

¶27

It is open to Respondent No. 1 to take such steps as adviced in

¶28

accordance with law to claim the amounts from Respondent Nos. 2 to 4.

¶29

4. Petition disposed.

¶30

(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)

¶31

( K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

¶32

This order has been modified by Speaking to the Minutes of the Order dated 31/01/2023

¶33

Purti Parab

Bombay Mercantile Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax and 5 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bombay Mercantile Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax and 5 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Global Offshore Services Limited Vs the Union of India through Its Secretary and 2 Ors.

PrafHul N. Vaghani Vs the State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors.

Drums Food International Pvt.Ltd. Vs the Union of India through the Secretary and 4 Ors.

Dharam Jumani Vs Assistant Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax and 2 Ors.

Ortho Clinical Diagnostics India Vs the Union of India and 3 Ors.

M/S. Asis India Infrastructure Ltd. Vs Union of India through Secretary and Ors.