Disposed

Sachin Prabhakarrao Deshmukh and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC13 Jun 2022WP/5367/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Six petitioners challenged their erroneous pay fixation under 6th and 7th Pay Commission recommendations pending before respondent No.5. The court directed respondent No.5 to consider their representation and pass a reasoned order by 30.08.2022 without issuing notice to other respondents.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.5 to consider the pending representation and pass a reasoned order on or before 30th August, 2022.

Sachin Prabhakarrao Deshmukh and Others Vs… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

( 1 ) wp5367.22

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

44 WRIT PETITION NO.5367 OF 2022

¶4

SACHIN PRABHAKARRAO DESHMUKH AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶5

Mr.R.D. Bhalerao, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr.A.R. Kale, AGP for respondent/State.

¶6

CORAM: RAVINDRA V. GHUGE &
ANIL L. PANSARE, JJ.
DATED : 13.06.2022

¶7

PC :-

¶8

01.The six petitioners before us are aggrieved that their pay fixation
in accordance with 6th and 7th Pay Commission recommendations, has been
erroneously settled. A detailed representation dated 17th April, 2021,
addressed to respondent No.5 – Authority is pending and no decision is
delivered by the said authority. It is pointed out that in the identical set of
circumstances, this Court has earlier passed an order dated 17th February,
2022 in Writ Petition No.2304 of 2022 filed by Vinod Lahu Patil Vs. The State
of Maharashtra and Ors.

¶9

02.Considering that an innocuous prayer is putforth, we have heard
the learned AGP on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4. We are not required to
issue notice to respondent Nos.5 and 6.

¶10

03.As such, this petition is disposed off. We direct respondent No.5
to consider the representation dated 17th April, 2021 in the light of the
grounds set out by the petitioners, strictly in accordance with the law and the
policy applicable. A reasoned order be passed on the said representation on
or before 30th August, 2022.

¶11

 [ANIL L. PANSARE,J.]

¶12

[RAVINDRA V. GHUGE,J.]

¶13

snk/2022/JUN22/wp5367.22

Sachin Prabhakarrao Deshmukh and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sachin Prabhakarrao Deshmukh and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shriniwas Sambhaji Munde through Guardian Sambhaji Gopinath Munde Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Shriniwas Sambhaji Munde through Guardian Sambhaji Gopinath Munde Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Shriniwas Sambhaji Munde through Guardian Sambhaji Gopinath Munde Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Baburao Rangnathrao Mane and Others Vs Abhinav Goyal and Others

Abhijit Bhisram Rathod Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

Bijapure Ghudusab Dastagir Vs the Union of India and Another