In this writ petition concerning dismissal and reinstatement from state transport corporation service, the court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner had lost interest and failed to appear.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp 4959.2008
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.4959/2008
Ramesh Dhannu Gondane ... Petitioner
Vice Chairman and managing Director, M.S.R.T.C., Mumbai ... Respondents
Mr. V.G. Wankhede, Advocate for Respondent.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND ANIL L. PANSARE, JJ.
DATE : 7 APRIL 2022
P.C. :
None for the Petitioner again.
2 wp 4959.2008
service but, without any backwages. Affidavit is filed by the Respondent stating that the Petitioner was reinstated and suspension allowance was also paid thereafter, the Petitioner retired on superannuation.
(ANIL L. PANSARE, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
Deshmukh
Ramesh Dhannu Gondane
Vice Chairman and managing Director, M.S.R.T.C., Mumbai
Nitin Jamdar
Anil L. Pansare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
