Petitioner claimed special pay for work with additional charge. Court dismissed the writ petition held alone for non-prosecution noting petitioner's expired interest and partial payment made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp4540.2008
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.4540/2008
Abhimanyu S/o Ganesh Surkar (dead) through Legal Representative Pravin S/o Abhimanyu Surkar, aged about 39 Yrs., Occ. Service, R/o Pragatinagar, Plot No.23, Near Doctor’s Colony, Nagpur -27.
... Petitioner
wp4540.2008
2
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. A.A. Madiwale, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
None for Respondent Nos.3 and 4.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND ANIL L. PANSARE, JJ.
DATE : 7 APRIL 2022
P.C. :
None appears for the Petitioner again.
3 wp4540.2008
remaining amount was refused because requisite permission was not taken before giving charge. The stipulation of taking permission is included in the Government Resolution dated 10 May 1990 itself.
Signed By:NILESH VILASRAO Tambaskar. TAMBASKAR Private Secretary Signing Date:12.04.2022 14:57
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant special pay claiming 12% interest for a period not fully sanctioned per Government Resolution requirements.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pravin S/o Abhimanyu Surkar
State of Maharashtra
Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur Division
Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nagpur
Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Nagpur
Block Education Officer, Panchayat Samiti Mouda
Nitin Jamdar
Anil L. Pansare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
